A Peggy Whitcomb review
Coloring the News
by Matthew McGowan
Machiavelli says in "The
Prince" that a people once free in an orderly society are extremely difficult
to enslave, and that if they are enslaved, will never stop rebelling against
their oppressors. Lost freedoms will never be forgotten.
One wonders whether the same
is true of a once proud, independent profession whose leaders have successfully
enfeebled it to serve an ideology that is at cross purposes with the culture
that sustains it..
Matthew McGowan describes, in "Coloring the News," a major
change in the goals and ethics of the American mainstream media over the
past few decades. Truthful and investigative news reporting and commentary
have been largely abandoned in favor of political advocacy and activism
in service to the Leftist gods of 'diversity' and 'multiculturalism'. He
says the process began with no debate, continued almost invisibly
for some years, but that since the early 1990s has been characterized in
newspapers and
broadcasting by a religious revivalist fervor that brooks no dissent,
either within newsrooms or from the public.
At nearly every major news industry gathering, speaker
after speaker exhorts convention participants -- reporters, editors and
newsroom managers -- to dedicate themselves unstintingly to atoning for
past sins against racial minorities, immigrants and the differently-gendered.
. The goal is to reduce prejudice in the wider culture, and to give minorities
a 'boost-up'. They are assured that it will be good for their souls, and
good for business.
McGowan, himself a liberal journalist, applauds this goal, but
for the past 10 years has taken a hard look at the methods for achieving
it, and has dug into the truth about the consequences of those methods.
The methods, as outlined by McGowan, are censorship by
the huge corporate news organizations in reporting on such as the high
rates of crime and illegitimacy among young blacks; deliberate lying in
news stories about the backlash from Americans, both minorities and whites,
against affirmative action as well as against bilingual education; and
more than a touch of judicious laziness as evidenced by reporters blithely
reporting, without a
shred of investigation, statements by minority members alleging racism.
Perhaps, also, because diversity, multiculturalism, and
post-modern moral relativity form the framework of the major journalism
schools, those now entering the industry no longer have an appreciation
for the exacting information needs of an electorate in a democratic republic.
Today, when journalism students talk about 'changing the
world' they aren't referring to getting accurate information to a vibrant,
intellectually-curious, concerned public that needs to know the facts in
order to create solutions to societal problems. They are talking about
how they, the truly well-educated 'elite,' plan to manipulate a largely
(in their view) ignorant, brutish, and deeply racist American public into
seeing minorities the way the media sees them: as damaged human beings
incapable of competing in a society of historically unsurpassed opportunities
(that actually the minorities have themselves helped create).
McGowan is naturally concerned about the damage done to
his profession by unquestioning service to diversity. Good for the
soul? Not according to the reporters, editors and newsroom managers he
interviewed over the years who have rebelled against hewing to the "party
line". The New York Times, the L.A. Times, the Washington Post and other
major news organs permit newsroom panels staffed by minority members to
oversee the language
used by non-minority reporters, to ensure that minorities in
the public never find cause for offense in newspaper stories. Journalists
who write truthfully about corruption in city police departments resulting
from lowered standards (and fewer criminal history checks) in order to
hire more minority members, for example, will find himself, or herself,
ostracized and condemned by their colleagues. And sometimes, looking for
a new job.
During the 1980s and 1990s, the mainstream media deliberately
decieved the public about the danger of AIDS to the general heterosexual
public because the homosexual special interest groups wanted to deflect
public attention away from the primary cause of the AIDS explosion -- their
promiscuous lifestyles.
Promotions, pay increases and perhaps continued employment
for senior editors are often contingent upon how successful they are in
hiring and promoting minority staff, regardless of qualifications or performance.
These policies do not make for happy campers in the newsrooms. And sometimes
leave minority members in doubt about their own abilities.
Until the 1980s, the main goal of newspapers and television
was to make money, and they went to considerable lengths to interest their
customers. But after the mainstream media bosses began enforcing the industry's
conversion to their new religion of diversity, they've steadily destroyed
their credibility. Newspaper circulation continues to decline. Television
news is stultifying, and viewers are increasingly turning to Fox News Channel,
which makes an effort to present both liberal and conservative points of
view.
Instead of reconsidering their policies, the mainstream
media are incredibly redoubling their efforts to hound a recalcitrant public
into policies the public sees as damaging to all members of our society.
Recently Dan Rather intoned that a "hyper-patriotic" public
makes it difficult for reporters to question the purpose and value of our
war on terrorism. Since Dan Rather and his colleagues consider themselves
in the business of telling the public what is "good for them" instead of
what is going on in the world, one wonders if perhaps his sponsors have
expressed some
concerns. Could it be that the sponsors are worrying about a patriotic
public's reaction to the lack of patriotism on the part of the media? It
is the advertisers, and the consumers of their products, after all, who
pay those glorious salaries to Rather and his colleagues.
"Coloring the News" is well-written and organized, with
excellent and well-researched examples of the media's exploitation of American
minorities in order to further a political agenda. McGowan laments the
ongoing and planned deceit by the major news organs. He says that liberals
as well as conservatives should be concerned. Where there is planned public
deceit there is corruption which oppresses the people, and destroys their
confidence in the institutions on which they rely.
Though his focus is the failures and enfeebling of his
profession, McGowan's examples reveal the true horror of diversity, which
is the damage done to the minorities themselves. America cannot afford
the loss of full competitive participation by our minority members.
Just as the Islamic countries are impoverished by excluding ("protecting")
their women from daily economic and political life, so too is America impoverished
by any perception that minority members are incapable of competing in our
society, or that they must be protected from the consequences of their
actions.
(OMED: Mr. McGowan is a fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute.
Miss Peggy is Oregon Magazine's most prolific reviewer)
© 2002 Peggy Whitcomb |