| John Kerry: Vietnam's answer
to Audie Murphy?
OMED: Former Portlander, Tom Lipscomb,
often contributes to Oregon Magazine. Herein, he addresses the subject
of Vietnam heroics by John Kerry of Massachusetts What struck us
when this topic recently came up during Kerry's run for the Democrat nomination,
was the brevity of the span in which the senator achieved
his citations. It looks like four months. Combat medals like the
Silver (or Bronze) Star are, like the Congressional Medal of Honor, given
for extraordinary bravery. We have been unable to determine the true nature
of Kerry's extraordinary bravery.
Another problem is that we can't determine
who wrote Kerry's citations. From here, it looks like he did.
With respect to the other honors, Purple
Hearts are a specific category of their own. They are not a measure
of heroism above and beyond the call of duty. It would be more accurate
to describe them as recognition for suffering harm while doing one's duty.
It is possible for a soldier to win the Congressional Medal of Honor without
suffering a single wound. In that case, the soldier who got the CMOH
would not get a Purple Heart. As with the Silver and Bronze Stars,
it is the actions of the soldier as described in a citation which determine
if the CMOH is given.
A Purple Heart is different. For example,
though this description is not a complete one, it is awarded to anybody
who is hit by enemy fire in a combat area. Whether he is killed or
just gets patched up by a frontline medical corpsman, he gets the Purple
Heart. Bullet wounds, being stabbed, fragments from artillery shells
or grenades -- these and other incidents, if they cause injury to any serious
degree, qualify.
The problem with Kerry's Purple Hearts
is that three of them in four months raise questions. Below the Lipscomb
piece you will find some text from veterans of that war. They contain
in-country experience which asks similar questions to ours. (LL)
A Little Sunshine for Winter Soldier, John Kerry
By Thomas Lipscomb
February 28, 2004 -- Presidential candidate John Kerry recently wrote
a letter to President Bush complaining that “you and your campaign have
initiated a widespread attack on my service in Vietnam, my decision to
speak out to end that war” and warning "I will not sit back and allow my
patriotism to be challenged." In the absence of any evidence from Kerry
of an attack from the Bush campaign, Kerry seems to have originated his
own doctrine of “preemption.” How valid are his concerns?
(Photo
links to its source, a page on this kind of warcraft by a vet who served
on them.)
No one denies John Kerry’s bemedaled four months in “Swiftboats,” (OMED:
some doubt the quality of that service, which you will see discussed below
this piece) or his seven months service as an electrical officer on
board the USS Gridley during its cruises back and forth to California,
or even his months as an Admiral’s aide in Brooklyn before he was able
get out of the Navy six months early to run for office. (OMED: Rather
similar to Bush getting out of the National Guard to work on a political
campaign.)
Taking a look at Kerry’s much-promoted Vietnam service, Kerry’s military
record was indeed remarkable in many ways. Last week former assistant secretary
of Defense and Fletcher School of Diplomacy professor W. Scott Thompson
recalled a conversation with the late ADM Elmo Zumwalt that clearly
had a slightly different take on Kerry’s recollection of their discussions:
“… the fabled and distinguished Chief of Naval Operations (CNO),
Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, told me -- 30 years ago when he was still CNO --
that during his own command of US naval forces in Vietnam, just prior to
his anointment as CNO, young Kerry had created great problems for him and
the other top brass, by killing so many non-combatant civilians and going
after other non-military targets.
‘We had virtually to straight-jacket him to keep him under control,’
the admiral said. But Zumwalt got it right when he assessed Kerry as having
large ambitions -- but promised that his career in Vietnam would haunt
him if he were ever on the national stage”.
And this statement was made despite the fact Zumwalt had personally
pinned a Silver Star on John Kerry.
Kerry was assigned to “Swiftboat” 44 on December 1, 1968. Within 24
hours he had his first Purple Heart. Kerry accumulated three Purple Hearts
in four months with not even a day of duty lost from wounds according to
his training officer. It’s a pity one cannot read his Purple Heart medical
treatment reports which have been withheld from the public. The only person
preventing their release is Senator John Kerry.
By his own admission during those four months Kerry continually kept
ramming his Swiftboat onto an enemy-held shore on assorted occasions alone
and with a few men, killing civilians and even a wounded enemy soldier.
One can begin to appreciate ADM Zumwalt’s problem with Kerry as commander
of an unarmored craft dependent upon speed of maneuver to keep it and its
crew from being shot to pieces. Kerry now refers to those civilian deaths
as “accidents of war.” And within four days of his third Purple Heart Kerry
applied to take advantage of a technicality which allowed him to request
immediate transfer to a stateside post.
Once back in the States, Kerry joined “the struggle for our veterans,”
as he called it last week in Atlanta, by joining a scruffy organization
called the “Vietnam Veterans Against the War,” The VVAW’s Executive
Director, Al Hubbard, supposedly a former Air Force captain wounded in
Vietnam, quickly appointed Kerry to the Executive Committee. Kerry
participated with the VVAW at agitprop rallies like Valley Forge and the
“Winter Soldier” guerrilla theater atrocity trials in Detroit, finally
testifying in April 1971 before the US Senate as an authority on the war
crimes his fellow American servicemen had committed in Vietnam.
Outside of his own “accidents of war” there is no evidence that Kerry
had then or has now the least idea what may or may not have been the realities
of ground combat. But he had no problem reeling off for the Senate a series
of unproven second-hand allegations that would have been perfectly at home
at the Nuremberg trials indicting his fellow veterans
Kerry stated there were "war crimes committed in Southeast Asia...not
isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the
full awareness of officers at all levels of command. They relived the absolute
horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do."
Kerry got specific:
"They had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires
from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut
off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages
in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned
food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam...we
are more guilty than any other body of violations of those Geneva Conventions;
in the use of free-fire zones, harassment interdiction fire, search and
destroy missions, the bombings, the torture of prisoners, all accepted
policy by many units in South Vietnam."
In other words My Lai was just another day in the life in the Vietnam
War.
This wasn’t a one-time occasion. The Vietnam Veterans Against
the War had been peddling this line from the day Kerry joined them and
had been publishing charges like this for the previous two years.
Kerry repeated them on “Meet the Press” with Al Hubbard who was found
to be a total fraud who never served in Vietnam, much less was wounded.
But Kerry has never renounced the charges he made.
Recently his fellow VVAW supporter Jane Fonda has tried to minimize
a potentially damaging picture of him a few rows behind her at the three
day VVAW Valley Forge rally in September of 1970. And many members of the
press fell for the line that it was accidental or coincidental including
Fox’s Chris Wallace and ABC’s Tim Russert.
But there were only 8 or 9 speakers that day including Donald Sutherland,
Mark Lane, Bella Abzug, Jane Fonda. And far from being a casual audience
member, Executive Committee member John Kerry, not Jane Fonda, was the
lead speaker. Jane Fonda had been funding VVAW events since before
Kerry had joined its Executive Committee. At Valley Forge Fonda said: “…My
Lai was not an isolated incident but rather a way of life for many of our
military.” Their appearance together in this picture may be a lot of things,
but it was not a coincidence.
Kerry has already confessed his complicity in killing civilians as “accidents
of war.” But he has offered a classic Nuremberg defense that this was not
only a commonplace occurrence thoughout the Vietnam war, but he was carrying
out a policy “with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.”
His commander of naval operations in Vietnam, who
specifically designed the mission Kerry and the other Swiftboat
commanders executed, ADM Elmo Zumwalt, clearly disagrees.
An examination of the truth behind this disagreement is not an attack
on Kerry. It is a matter of vital historical interest.
--- TL
| Thoughts from a Vietnam Vets forum site
I was in the Delta shortly after he left. I know that area well.
I know the operations he was involved in well. I know the tactics
and the doctrine used. I know the equipment Although I was
attached to CTF-116 (PBRs) I spent a fair amount of time with CTF-115
(swift boats), Kerry's command.
Here are my problems and suspicions:
(1) Kerry was in-country less than four months and collected, a Bronze
Star, a Silver Star and three purple hearts. I never heard of anybody with
any outfit I worked with (including SEAL One, the Sea Wolves, Riverines
and the River Patrol Force) collecting that much hardware so fast, and
for such pedestrian actions. The Swifts did a commendable job. But that
duty wasn't the worst you could draw. They operated only along the
coast and in the major rivers (Bassac and Mekong). The rough stuff
in the hot areas was mainly handled by the smaller, faster PBRs.
(2) Three Purple Hearts but no limp. All injuries so minor
that no time lost from duty. Amazing luck. Or he was putting
himself in for medals every time he bumped his head on the wheel house
hatch? Combat on the boats was almost always at close range.
You didn't have minor wounds. At least not often. Not three
times in a row. Then he used the three purple hearts to request a
trip home eight months before the end of his tour. Fishy.
(3) The details of the event for which he was given the Silver
Star make no sense at all. Supposedly, a B-40 was fired at the boat
and missed. Charlie (OMED: an enemy soldier) jumps up with
the launcher in his hand, the bow gunner knocks him down with the twin
50, Kerry beaches the boat, jumps off, shoots Charlie, and retreives the
launcher. If true, he did everything wrong.
(a) Standard procedure when you took rocket fire was to put your stern
to the action and go balls to the wall. A B-40 has the ballistic
integrity of a frisbie after about 25 yards, so you put 50 yards or so
between you and the beach and begin raking it with your 50's.
(b) Did you ever see anybody get knocked down with a 50 caliber
round and get up? The guy was dead or dying. The rocket launcher
was empty. There was no reason to go after him (except if you knew
he was no danger to you just flopping around in the dust during his
last few seconds on earth, and you wanted some derring do in your after-action
report). And we didn't shoot wounded people. We had rules against
that, too.
(c) Kerry got off the boat. This was a major breach of standing
procedures. Nobody on a boat crew ever got off a boat in a hot area.
EVER! The reason was simple. If you had somebody on the beach
your boat was defenseless. It coudn't run and it couldn' t return
fire. It was stupid and it put his crew in danger. He should have
been relieved and reprimanded. I never heard of any boat crewman
ever leaving a boat during or after a firefight.
Something is fishy.
Here we have a JFK wannabe (the guy Halsey wanted to court martial for
carelessly losing his boat and getting a couple people killed by running
across the bow of a Jap destroyer) who is hardly in Vietnam long enough
to get good tan, collects medals faster than Audie Murphy in a job where
lots of medals weren't common, gets sent home eight months early, requests
separation from active duty a few months after that so he can run for Congress,
finds out war heros don't sell well in Massachsetts in 1970 so reinvents
himself as Jane Fonda, throws his ribbons in the dirt with the cameras
running (OMED: Kerry did not throw his own medals away. They were
fakes, or belonged to somebody else.) to jump start his political career,
gets Stillborn Pell to invite him to address Congress and Bobby Kennedy's
speechwriter to do the heavy lifting, winds up in the Senate himself a
few years later, votes against every major defense bill, says the CIA is
irrelevant after the Wall came down, votes against the Gulf War,
a big mistake since that turned out well, decides not to make the same
mistake twice so votes for invading Iraq, but oops, that didn't turn out
so well so he now says he really didn't mean for Bush to go to war when
he voted to allow him to go to war.
I'm real glad you or I never had this guy covering out flanks in Vietnam.
I sure don't want him as Commander in Chief. I hope that somebody
from CTF-115 shows up with some facts challenging Kerry's Vietnam record.
I know in my gut it's wildy inflated. And fishy.
-- Steve Keefer
KIRK LUEHRS wrote:
I have got the same concerns as this guy. I can not find Kerry listed
as a Coastal Div 11 swift boat skipper for either the 44 or the 94 other
men are listed as O in C at the time he was supposedly the skipper. any
way other folks are raising some righteous concerns see below
-- kirk
Anyone out there know someone that served with CTF-115 ??? |
OMED: My combat experience is limited to
Hollywood war movies. The forum text above was not included with Tom Lipscomb's
original piece. I had it in a file in my computer, and thought that
what Vietnam combat vets had to say about this is what in court is known
as "best evidence." In the end, it is they who must judge the
veracity of Kerry's record.
Column text © 2004 Thomas Lipscomb, who is the founder
of (New York) Times Books, and was the publisher of ADM Elmo Zumwalt’s
bestselling ON WATCH. Presently, he heads the Center for the Digital
Future and is a nationally-known columnist, appearing in major U.S. newspapers. |