Oregon Magazine
  Cover |   Table of Contents


 
John Kerry: Vietnam's answer to Audie Murphy?

OMED: Former Portlander, Tom Lipscomb, often contributes to Oregon Magazine.  Herein, he addresses the subject of Vietnam heroics by John Kerry of Massachusetts  What struck us when this topic recently came up during Kerry's run for the Democrat nomination, was the brevity of the span in which the senator achieved his citations.  It looks like four months. Combat medals like the Silver (or Bronze) Star are, like the Congressional Medal of Honor, given for extraordinary bravery. We have been unable to determine the true nature of Kerry's extraordinary bravery. 

Another problem is that we can't determine who wrote Kerry's  citations.  From here, it looks like he did.  

With respect to the other honors, Purple Hearts are a specific category of their own.  They are not a measure of heroism above and beyond the call of duty.  It would be more accurate to describe them as recognition for suffering harm while doing one's duty. It is possible for a soldier to win the Congressional Medal of Honor without suffering a single wound.  In that case, the soldier who got the CMOH would not get a Purple Heart.  As with the Silver and Bronze Stars, it is the actions of the soldier as described in a citation which determine if the CMOH is given.  

A Purple Heart is different. For example, though this description is not a complete one, it is awarded to anybody who is hit by enemy fire in a combat area.  Whether he is killed or just gets patched up by a frontline medical corpsman, he gets the Purple Heart.  Bullet wounds, being stabbed, fragments from artillery shells or grenades -- these and other incidents, if they cause injury to any serious degree, qualify.  

The problem with Kerry's Purple Hearts is that three of them in four months raise questions.  Below the Lipscomb piece you will find some text from veterans of that war.  They contain in-country experience which asks similar questions to ours.  (LL)

A Little Sunshine for Winter Soldier, John Kerry
By Thomas Lipscomb

February 28, 2004 -- Presidential candidate John Kerry recently wrote a letter to President Bush complaining that “you and your campaign have initiated a widespread attack on my service in Vietnam, my decision to speak out to end that war” and warning "I will not sit back and allow my patriotism to be challenged." In the absence of any evidence from Kerry of an attack from the Bush campaign, Kerry seems to have originated his own doctrine of “preemption.” How valid are his concerns?

(Photo links to its source, a page on this kind of warcraft by a vet who served on them.)

No one denies John Kerry’s bemedaled four months in “Swiftboats,” (OMED: some doubt the quality of that service, which you will see discussed below this piece) or his seven months service as an electrical officer on board the USS Gridley during its cruises back and forth to California, or even his months as an Admiral’s aide in Brooklyn before he was able get out of the Navy six months early to run for office. (OMED: Rather similar to Bush getting out of the National Guard to work on a political campaign.)

Taking a look at Kerry’s much-promoted Vietnam service, Kerry’s military record was indeed remarkable in many ways. Last week former assistant secretary of Defense and Fletcher School of Diplomacy professor W. Scott Thompson recalled a conversation with the late ADM Elmo Zumwalt that clearly had a slightly different take on Kerry’s recollection of their discussions: 

 “… the fabled and distinguished Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, told me -- 30 years ago when he was still CNO -- that during his own command of US naval forces in Vietnam, just prior to his anointment as CNO, young Kerry had created great problems for him and the other top brass, by killing so many non-combatant civilians and going after other non-military targets. 

‘We had virtually to straight-jacket him to keep him under control,’ the admiral said. But Zumwalt got it right when he assessed Kerry as having large ambitions -- but promised that his career in Vietnam would haunt him if he were ever on the national stage”. 

And this statement was made despite the fact Zumwalt had personally pinned a Silver Star on John Kerry.

Kerry was assigned to “Swiftboat” 44 on December 1, 1968. Within 24 hours he had his first Purple Heart. Kerry accumulated three Purple Hearts in four months with not even a day of duty lost from wounds according to his training officer. It’s a pity one cannot read his Purple Heart medical treatment reports which have been withheld from the public. The only person preventing their release is Senator John Kerry. 

By his own admission during those four months Kerry continually kept ramming his Swiftboat onto an enemy-held shore on assorted occasions alone and with a few men, killing civilians and even a wounded enemy soldier. One can begin to appreciate ADM Zumwalt’s problem with Kerry as commander of an unarmored craft dependent upon speed of maneuver to keep it and its crew from being shot to pieces. Kerry now refers to those civilian deaths as “accidents of war.” And within four days of his third Purple Heart Kerry applied to take advantage of a technicality which allowed him to request immediate transfer to a stateside post. 

Once back in the States, Kerry joined “the struggle for our veterans,” as he called it last week in Atlanta, by joining a scruffy organization called the “Vietnam Veterans Against the War,”  The VVAW’s Executive Director, Al Hubbard, supposedly a former Air Force captain wounded in
Vietnam, quickly appointed Kerry to the Executive Committee. Kerry participated with the VVAW at agitprop rallies like Valley Forge and the “Winter Soldier” guerrilla theater atrocity trials in Detroit, finally testifying in April 1971 before the US Senate as an authority on the war crimes his fellow American servicemen had committed in Vietnam. 

Outside of his own “accidents of war” there is no evidence that Kerry had then or has now the least idea what may or may not have been the realities of ground combat. But he had no problem reeling off for the Senate a series of unproven second-hand allegations that would have been perfectly at home at the Nuremberg trials indicting his fellow veterans

Kerry stated there were "war crimes committed in Southeast Asia...not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do." 

Kerry got specific:

"They had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam...we are more guilty than any other body of violations of those Geneva Conventions; in the use of free-fire zones, harassment interdiction fire, search and destroy missions, the bombings, the torture of prisoners, all accepted policy by many units in South Vietnam."

In other words My Lai was just another day in the life in the Vietnam War.

This wasn’t a one-time occasion.  The Vietnam Veterans Against the War had been peddling this line from the day Kerry joined them and had been publishing charges like this for the previous two years.  Kerry repeated them on “Meet the Press” with Al Hubbard who was found to be a total fraud who never served in Vietnam, much less was wounded. But Kerry has never renounced the charges he made. 

Recently his fellow VVAW supporter Jane Fonda has tried to minimize a potentially damaging picture of him a few rows behind her at the three day VVAW Valley Forge rally in September of 1970. And many members of the press fell for the line that it was accidental or coincidental including Fox’s Chris Wallace and ABC’s Tim Russert.

But there were only 8 or 9 speakers that day including Donald Sutherland, Mark Lane, Bella Abzug, Jane Fonda. And far from being a casual audience member, Executive Committee member John Kerry, not Jane Fonda, was the lead speaker.  Jane Fonda had been funding VVAW events since before Kerry had joined its Executive Committee. At Valley Forge Fonda said: “…My Lai was not an isolated incident but rather a way of life for many of our military.” Their appearance together in this picture may be a lot of things, but it was not a coincidence.

Kerry has already confessed his complicity in killing civilians as “accidents of war.” But he has offered a classic Nuremberg defense that this was not only a commonplace occurrence thoughout the Vietnam war, but he was carrying out a policy “with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.” His commander of naval operations in Vietnam, who 
specifically designed the mission Kerry and the other Swiftboat 
commanders executed, ADM Elmo Zumwalt, clearly disagrees. 

An examination of the truth behind this disagreement is not an attack on Kerry. It is a matter of vital historical interest. 

                                                --- TL
 

Thoughts from a Vietnam Vets forum site

I was in the Delta shortly after he left.  I know that area well.  I know the operations he was involved in well.  I know the tactics and the doctrine used.  I know the equipment  Although I was attached to CTF-116 (PBRs) I spent a fair amount of  time with CTF-115 (swift boats), Kerry's command.

Here are my problems and suspicions:

(1) Kerry was in-country less than four months and collected, a Bronze Star, a Silver Star and three purple hearts. I never heard of anybody with any outfit I worked with (including SEAL One, the Sea Wolves, Riverines and the River Patrol Force) collecting that much hardware so fast, and for such pedestrian actions. The Swifts did a commendable job. But that duty wasn't the worst you could draw.  They operated only along the coast and in the major rivers (Bassac and Mekong).  The rough stuff in the hot areas was mainly handled by the smaller, faster PBRs.

(2)  Three Purple Hearts but no limp.  All injuries so minor that no time lost from duty.  Amazing luck.  Or he was putting himself in for medals every time he bumped his head on the wheel house hatch?  Combat on the boats was almost always at close range.  You didn't have minor wounds.  At least not often.  Not three times in a row.  Then he used the three purple hearts to request a trip home eight months before the end of his tour.  Fishy.

(3)  The details of the event for which he was given the Silver Star make no sense at all.  Supposedly, a B-40 was fired at the boat and missed.  Charlie (OMED: an enemy soldier) jumps up with the launcher in his hand, the bow gunner knocks him down with the twin 50, Kerry beaches the boat, jumps off, shoots Charlie, and retreives the launcher.  If true, he did everything wrong.

(a) Standard procedure when you took rocket fire was to put your stern to the action and go balls to the wall.  A B-40 has the ballistic integrity of a frisbie after about 25 yards, so you put 50 yards or so between you and the beach and begin raking it with your 50's.

(b)  Did you ever see anybody get knocked down with a 50 caliber round and get up?  The guy was dead or dying.  The rocket launcher was empty.  There was no reason to go after him (except if you knew he was no danger to you just flopping around  in the dust during his last few seconds on earth, and you wanted some derring do in your after-action report). And we didn't shoot wounded people.  We had rules against that, too.

(c)  Kerry got off the boat.  This was a major breach of standing procedures.  Nobody on a boat crew ever got off a boat in a hot area. EVER!  The reason was simple.  If you had somebody on the beach your boat was defenseless.  It coudn't run and it couldn' t return fire. It was stupid and it put his crew in danger.  He should have been relieved and reprimanded.  I never heard of any boat crewman ever leaving a boat during or after a firefight.

Something is fishy.

Here we have a JFK wannabe (the guy Halsey wanted to court martial for carelessly losing his boat and getting a couple people killed by running across the bow of a Jap destroyer) who is hardly in Vietnam long enough to get good tan, collects medals faster than Audie Murphy in a job where lots of medals weren't common, gets sent home eight months early, requests separation from active duty a few months after that so he can run for Congress, finds out war heros don't sell well in Massachsetts in 1970 so reinvents himself as Jane Fonda, throws his ribbons in the dirt with the cameras running (OMED: Kerry did not throw his own medals away.  They were fakes, or belonged to somebody else.) to jump start his political career, gets Stillborn Pell to invite him to address Congress and Bobby Kennedy's speechwriter to do the heavy lifting, winds up in the Senate himself a few years later, votes against every major defense bill, says the CIA is irrelevant after the Wall came down, votes against  the Gulf War, a big mistake since that turned out well, decides not to make the same mistake twice so votes for invading Iraq, but oops, that didn't turn out so well so he now says he really didn't mean for Bush to go to war when he voted to allow him to go to war.

I'm real glad you or I never had this guy covering out flanks in Vietnam.  I sure don't want him as Commander in Chief.  I hope that somebody from CTF-115 shows up with some facts challenging Kerry's Vietnam record.  I know in my gut it's wildy inflated.  And fishy.

                                     -- Steve Keefer

KIRK LUEHRS wrote:
I have got the same concerns as this guy. I can not find Kerry listed as a Coastal Div 11 swift boat skipper for either the 44 or the 94 other men are listed as O in C at the time he was supposedly the skipper. any way other folks are raising some righteous concerns see below

                                                  --  kirk 

Anyone out there know someone that served with CTF-115 ???

OMED: My combat experience is limited to Hollywood war movies. The forum text above was not included with Tom Lipscomb's original piece.  I had it in a file in my computer, and thought that what Vietnam combat vets had to say about this is what in court is known as "best evidence."   In the end, it is they who must judge the veracity of Kerry's record.  

Column text © 2004 Thomas Lipscomb, who is the founder of (New York) Times Books, and was the publisher of ADM Elmo Zumwalt’s bestselling ON WATCH.  Presently, he heads the Center for the Digital Future and is a nationally-known columnist, appearing in major U.S. newspapers.  

      Around Oregon News Digest  |  Arts&Lettres  |  Business  |  Editorial  |  Events  | Life&Styles
      Natural History  |  Outdoor   |  SciTech  |   Sports  |  Travel  |  Peg's Bottom Gazette  |  Contact