Oregon Magazine   Traveling the West?  Stay at  Shilo Inns
   Cover  |  Table of Contents


 
Book Review

                                Been There, Done That!
                "FDR's Follies"  by Jim Powell
 

When Franklin D. Roosevelt took office in 1932, the American economy was already in a  depression, banks were failing, people couldn't find jobs, people were hungry.  FDR believed  that depressions were caused by unchecked, "greedy," big corporations, unregulated free  markets, and individuals accumulating what he considered as 'too much wealth'. He promised  America that he would wage war on big business, and during his presidency, assumed  unprecedented powers to prosecute that war.

Historian Jim Powell, author of "FDR's Follies," relates the history and development of the  massive New Deal programs, brief political biographies of the men who administered them, and  especially the effects of the often contradictory New Deal measures on the lives of  Americans. He draws extensively on recent decades of studies by economists and historians  who had noted that most histories on FDR focused on the political consequences of his New  Deal, not the economic consequences. 


Throughout his administrations Roosevelt enjoyed the support of Democratic party domination  in both houses of Congress. In the early New Deal years, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down  some of the New Deal measures as unconstitutional, but after FDR's attempts to 'pack the  Court,' enough of the Justices were intimidated so that a majority cooperated to support his  government take-over of the economy.  By Executive Orders and Congressional legislation,  with the Supreme Court backing, while reassuring the public with his fireside chats,  Roosevelt attacked capitalism and free markets in America. 

"Political support from farmers was a major reason FDR won the 1932 Democratic presidential  nomination...He promised farmers that he would somehow increase their income."  What the  farmers wanted was "compulsion, some way of limiting what everybody produced, to force  prices above market levels." The Agricultural Adjustment Act was passed by Congress in 1933,  and FDR presented it to the public "as an emergency  measure, but he envisioned permanent  government control of agriculture."  

Farmers were paid "$100 million to plow under some 10 million acres of farmland...Hog  farmers were paid to slaughter some 6 million baby pigs." This, at a time when millions of  Americans were going hungry. Paradoxically, "The Department of Agriculture issued a bulletin  telling the nation that the great problem of our time was our failure to produce enough food  to provide people with a mere subsistence diet..."


Landowning farmers fared well off the government subsidies, but the poorest farmers, tenants  and sharecroppers, realized no benefits. "The 1930 census reported there were about a  million and a half sharecroppers -- 671,000 blacks and 937,000 whites. The landowners did  not share their government payoffs, and had no need of their tenants and sharecroppers after  land was taken out of cultivation. The New Deal 'compassion' did not extend to the neediest,  after all.

But even landowners in the South, which voted solidly Democratic at every election, to a  man, did not receive subsidies as lucrative as those awarded to farmers in the Western  'swing' states, where Roosevelt needed to increase his popularity. By the same token,  Conservation Corps jobs and Public Work construction went primarily to the Western states as  well.

The pattern of lobbying by farmers, manufacturers, bankers and businessmen who asked for  protective programs that would limit competition and force up prices, continued and fit well  into FDR's plans.  The government promoted cartels of businessmen who helped draft the  necessary legislation. The subsidy funds were distributed through local Democratic party  leadership, and those politicians fought fiercely among themselves for the privilege of  dispensing this largesse. The funds were often blatantly used to buy votes through the  awarding of jobs and contracts.


FDR paid for his New Deal with confiscatory taxes on individuals and businesses. Heavy  taxation discouraged investment which would create new jobs. Unemployment held at 14% to  over 20%. The tax burden fell most heavily on the small businessmen, the mom-and-pop stores,  the poorest Americans, despite Roosevelt's ranting against "the wealthy."  There were, to be  sure, some relief programs, but again, the states receiving the most federal funds were the  comparatively wealthier states, not the poorest ones in the South. 

The public never demanded the New Deal laws that forced them to pay higher prices for fewer  goods and services; they did not ask for minimum wages that made them too expensive to hire.  They did not ask Roosevelt's Justice department to attack with civil and criminal lawsuits  the biggest employers in the nation, further reducing their opportunities for work. They did  not want their neighborhood dry cleaner fined and the owner imprisoned because he dared to  offer to press a suit for a few cents less than a New Deal law required. Women entering the  workplace found themselves unemployable because businessmen were required to pay women much  higher wages than men, "for their own protection," but really to protect men's jobs.  While  America despaired, FDR arrogantly and ignorantly undermined every effort Americans made to  recover from the depression.

The effect of the New Deal programs accomplished exactly what Roosevelt intended -- altering  the way America did business. He was well on the way to creating a command economy, similar  to the fascist economy in Italy which he and his administration stated often that they  admired. He goal was never higher employment rates, or cheaper goods and services. Those  were accomplished only when Roosevelt was sidetracked by a different kind of war, -- World  War II.


The legacy of his farm and manufacturing subsidies continue to this day, with all Americans  taxed in order to make a few more wealthy than they would be otherwise. Americans then and  now pay twice -- taxes for subsidies and higher prices for goods and services through  government-sponsored restricted production. 

Powell says, "Interestingly, it was a Democrat...who achieved the first big tax cuts from  FDR's World War II highs. In the 1960 election campaign, John F. Kennedy talked about tax  cuts as a strategy for stimulating the economy; and he won the election, in part, because  the Eisenhower-Nixon administration was blamed for the recession the country was  experiencing. Kennedy declared,"The final and best means of strengthening demand among  consumers and business is to reduce the burden on private income and the deterrents to  private initiative which are imposed by our present tax system...I am not talking about a  'quickie' or temporary tax cut...our present tax system...exerts too heavy a drag on growth ...siphons out of the private economy too large a share of personal and business purchasing  power..." 

Carter and Clinton raised taxes again, and Reagan and Bush again lowered them.  Democrats  seem to have learned nothing from FDR except to admire the power and control over the nation  he cleverly assumed, to our lasting detriment, and his skill in deceiving the public. Even  now, they would hang onto the failing Social Security program, they promise to  increase taxes, and they would again regulate businesses until they shrink, taking jobs away  from us.

No thanks. We've been there and done that. 

Peggy Whitcomb
November 19, 2003

© 2003 Peggy Whitcomb


 
      Around Oregon News Digest  |  Arts&Lettres  |  Business  |  Editorial  |  Events  | Life&Styles
      Natural History  |  Outdoor   |  SciTech  |   Sports  |  Travel  |  Peg's Bottom Gazette  |  Contact