| Book Review
Been There, Done That!
"FDR's Follies" by Jim Powell
When Franklin D. Roosevelt took office
in 1932, the American economy was already in a depression, banks
were failing, people couldn't find jobs, people were hungry. FDR
believed that depressions were caused by unchecked, "greedy," big
corporations, unregulated free markets, and individuals accumulating
what he considered as 'too much wealth'. He promised America that
he would wage war on big business, and during his presidency, assumed
unprecedented powers to prosecute that war.
Historian Jim Powell, author of "FDR's
Follies," relates the history and development of the massive New
Deal programs, brief political biographies of the men who administered
them, and especially the effects of the often contradictory New Deal
measures on the lives of Americans. He draws extensively on recent
decades of studies by economists and historians who had noted that
most histories on FDR focused on the political consequences of his New
Deal, not the economic consequences.
Throughout his administrations Roosevelt
enjoyed the support of Democratic party domination in both houses
of Congress. In the early New Deal years, the U.S. Supreme Court struck
down some of the New Deal measures as unconstitutional, but after
FDR's attempts to 'pack the Court,' enough of the Justices were intimidated
so that a majority cooperated to support his government take-over
of the economy. By Executive Orders and Congressional legislation,
with the Supreme Court backing, while reassuring the public with his fireside
chats, Roosevelt attacked capitalism and free markets in America.
"Political support from farmers was a major
reason FDR won the 1932 Democratic presidential nomination...He promised
farmers that he would somehow increase their income." What the
farmers wanted was "compulsion, some way of limiting what everybody produced,
to force prices above market levels." The Agricultural Adjustment
Act was passed by Congress in 1933, and FDR presented it to the public
"as an emergency measure, but he envisioned permanent government
control of agriculture."
Farmers were paid "$100 million to plow
under some 10 million acres of farmland...Hog farmers were paid to
slaughter some 6 million baby pigs." This, at a time when millions of
Americans were going hungry. Paradoxically, "The Department of Agriculture
issued a bulletin telling the nation that the great problem of our
time was our failure to produce enough food to provide people with
a mere subsistence diet..."
Landowning farmers fared well off the
government subsidies, but the poorest farmers, tenants and sharecroppers,
realized no benefits. "The 1930 census reported there were about a
million and a half sharecroppers -- 671,000 blacks and 937,000 whites.
The landowners did not share their government payoffs, and had no
need of their tenants and sharecroppers after land was taken out
of cultivation. The New Deal 'compassion' did not extend to the neediest,
after all.
But even landowners in the South, which
voted solidly Democratic at every election, to a man, did not receive
subsidies as lucrative as those awarded to farmers in the Western
'swing' states, where Roosevelt needed to increase his popularity. By the
same token, Conservation Corps jobs and Public Work construction
went primarily to the Western states as well.
The pattern of lobbying by farmers, manufacturers,
bankers and businessmen who asked for protective programs that would
limit competition and force up prices, continued and fit well into
FDR's plans. The government promoted cartels of businessmen who helped
draft the necessary legislation. The subsidy funds were distributed
through local Democratic party leadership, and those politicians
fought fiercely among themselves for the privilege of dispensing
this largesse. The funds were often blatantly used to buy votes through
the awarding of jobs and contracts.
FDR paid for his New Deal with confiscatory
taxes on individuals and businesses. Heavy taxation discouraged investment
which would create new jobs. Unemployment held at 14% to over 20%.
The tax burden fell most heavily on the small businessmen, the mom-and-pop
stores, the poorest Americans, despite Roosevelt's ranting against
"the wealthy." There were, to be sure, some relief programs,
but again, the states receiving the most federal funds were the comparatively
wealthier states, not the poorest ones in the South.
The public never demanded the New Deal
laws that forced them to pay higher prices for fewer goods and services;
they did not ask for minimum wages that made them too expensive to hire.
They did not ask Roosevelt's Justice department to attack with civil and
criminal lawsuits the biggest employers in the nation, further reducing
their opportunities for work. They did not want their neighborhood
dry cleaner fined and the owner imprisoned because he dared to offer
to press a suit for a few cents less than a New Deal law required. Women
entering the workplace found themselves unemployable because businessmen
were required to pay women much higher wages than men, "for their
own protection," but really to protect men's jobs. While America
despaired, FDR arrogantly and ignorantly undermined every effort Americans
made to recover from the depression.
The effect of the New Deal programs accomplished
exactly what Roosevelt intended -- altering the way America did business.
He was well on the way to creating a command economy, similar to
the fascist economy in Italy which he and his administration stated often
that they admired. He goal was never higher employment rates, or
cheaper goods and services. Those were accomplished only when Roosevelt
was sidetracked by a different kind of war, -- World War II.
The legacy of his farm and manufacturing
subsidies continue to this day, with all Americans taxed in order
to make a few more wealthy than they would be otherwise. Americans then
and now pay twice -- taxes for subsidies and higher prices for goods
and services through government-sponsored restricted production.
Powell says, "Interestingly, it was a Democrat...who
achieved the first big tax cuts from FDR's World War II highs. In
the 1960 election campaign, John F. Kennedy talked about tax cuts
as a strategy for stimulating the economy; and he won the election, in
part, because the Eisenhower-Nixon administration was blamed for
the recession the country was experiencing. Kennedy declared,"The
final and best means of strengthening demand among consumers and
business is to reduce the burden on private income and the deterrents to
private initiative which are imposed by our present tax system...I am not
talking about a 'quickie' or temporary tax cut...our present tax
system...exerts too heavy a drag on growth ...siphons out of the private
economy too large a share of personal and business purchasing power..."
Carter and Clinton raised taxes again,
and Reagan and Bush again lowered them. Democrats seem to have
learned nothing from FDR except to admire the power and control over the
nation he cleverly assumed, to our lasting detriment, and his skill
in deceiving the public. Even now, they would hang onto the failing
Social Security program, they promise to increase taxes, and
they would again regulate businesses until they shrink, taking jobs away
from us.
No thanks. We've been there and done that.
Peggy Whitcomb
November 19, 2003
© 2003 Peggy Whitcomb |